An unprecedented lawsuit has been filed in the economic department of the Tel Aviv District Court docket against Israeli unicorn Lusha, which 6 months back, lifted $205 million at a valuation of $1.5 billion. The lawsuit, filed by As well as Ventures undertaking money fund and Oren Abekasis, are suing Lusha and entrepreneurs Assaf Eisenstein, his wife Anat Eisenstein, and Yoni Tserruya. In the fit, Additionally Ventures and Abekasis are demanding rights to a 35% of the company’s shares.

The accommodate was filed by way of Advs. Zohar Lande, Eyal Nachshon, Dana Bookstein, and Naama Ben Aroush Moshe of Barnea Jaffa Lande & Co. legislation agency. In accordance to the accommodate, the Eisensteins and Tserruya fraudulently and powering the backs of the plaintiffs, undertook a approach intended to dispossess the fruits of the plaintiffs’ investment decision and shares, offer them with fake displays, and to steal from them the promising and profitable undertaking and product or service in which they invested which includes their legal rights and to develop the venture and solution, to trade them and advantage from the income.

The fit states that the plaintiffs invested tens of millions of shekels in the Neta Eisenstein business and cumulatively held 35% of its shares and rights. The plaintiffs did this sort of out of religion in the company’s products, in its vision, and in its lead entrepreneur, Assaf Eisenstein. All through this time period, the corporation targeted, amongst other matters, on advancement of the solution named Network Monkey, a web browser add-on, which as a result of checking and facts from web platforms, helps buyers in identifying target populations suitable to their wants.

In apply, in its most up-to-date kind, from March 2016, the solution has been largely developed to serve as an world-wide-web browser include-on, which permits people, browsing the LinkedIn internet site, to establish appropriate targets and obtain their personal specifics. The lawsuit states that in the 4 many years prior to the starting of 2016, the plaintiffs supported the organization in typical and Assaf Eisenstein in unique, and labored with him in get to fulfill, produce, implement, and boost the firm’s vision and dynamic targets, as effectively as the modern and promising enterprise and solution that it promoted.

In excess of the many years, the plaintiffs invested their dollars in the undertaking, according to the demands of Assaf Eisenstein who was the entrepreneur, director, CEO and spirit guiding the corporation, even though they relied on his shows and set their entire have confidence in in him. In addition to their income, the plaintiffs invested their time and experience in the firm and recommended Assaf Eisenstein.




Linked Articles or blog posts




Israeli B2B intelligence co Lusha raises $205m







“Only in hindsight did it develop into distinct to the plaintiffs, to their astonishment, that they continued to make investments their dollars and dedicate assets to the firm in response to Assaf Eisenstein’s requests, when he worked in the dim and powering their backs, alongside with his wife, in order to dispossess, oust and exclude the plaintiffs, and steal the undertaking and solution in full from the plaintiffs, and the rest of the company’s investors

“The plaintiffs also discovered that at some issue, Assaf linked with Yoni Tserruya with the purpose of ousting and thieving the total venture and products from the plaintiffs and other business investors. It is also claimed that it grew to become distinct to the plaintiffs subsequently that in the beginning of 2016, at the identical time that Assaf engaged in phony representation to the plaintiffs, declaring the venture experienced been concluded and had come as far as it could, Assaf related to Yoni Tzeruya, and jointly, they set out on a joint venture, with the project and its solution at its center.” The two secretly proven a new organization, while hiding their identity as shareholders, and they transferred the product or service to this new corporate framework.

It is also claimed that, “Assaf and Yoni applied the venture’s primary small business prepare they stole the company’s company secrets as well as its engineering, such as the original code of its flagship solution the two made use of the company’s crucial people, who secretly moved to employment at the ‘new venture’ and the two labored in the direction of the identical targets, tips, buyers, clientele, strategic designs, and advancement possibilities produced at the enterprise they even designed use of the plaintiffs’ revenue, which was supplied at the beginning to fund the company’s initiatives and merchandise.”

The lawsuit statements that the code was created for an identical function and is based mostly upon an similar code, which underwent blurring and camouflaging. The plaintiffs assert that they did not know of this exercise. The suit provides that Assaf began, as an additional line of false illustration and inappropriate routines, together with his wife, who even served as a director of the business, to try out and push for dismantling and liquidation of the Neta Eisenstein company, whilst hiding major details from the plaintiffs.

The fit statements that on March 18, 2016, the Eisenstein company presented the remaining version of the item, Network Monkey, which was extra to the Google Chrome application retail store. It was subsequently found that on that specific working day, an similar version of the application, termed Lusha, was also additional to the app retailer. That product, as the plaintiffs have acquired not long ago, was duplicated by Assaf Eisenstein and the enhancement and internet marketing teams at the Neta Eisenstein enterprise. This was attained by a top secret and separate company framework, and expertise of its existence was hardly ever shared with the plaintiffs and was stored from them.

In accordance to claims built by the undertaking capital fund, as a end result of an investigation, they found that from the starting of 2016, Assaf Eisenstein started to “perform a double recreation”, in which on the one particular hand, he functioned in his several roles at the Neta Eisenstein business and introduced to the plaintiffs phony displays, declaring that the firm was reaching the close of its functions and was to be liquidated when on the other hand, Assaf Eisenstein was operating in the shadows with his wife to transfer the job into the new corporate framework, which he recognized with Yoni Tzeruya. In accordance to the lawsuit, Eisenstein and Tzeruya had been knowledgeable of the seriousness of their actions and as a result blurred their identities as entrepreneurs of the duplicated application, working for an prolonged time period “under the radar.” Therefore, as element of the conspiracy that Eisenstein and Tzeruya place together, on May perhaps 22, 2016, Assaf Eisenstein proven the Lusha Techniques Ltd.

As a result of an further camouflage approach, the company’s shares were being not held directly and in the identify of the two “entrepreneurs.” Relatively, they had been held in rely on, by way of Y.D.H. Trusts, Ltd. Subsequently, it grew to become acknowledged to the plaintiffs that the company’s shares ended up held and equally divided (50-50) by Assaf Eisenstein and Yoni Tzeruya. The business then merged with another business with the identify DEV YT LTD., which was owned by Tzeruya.

The lawsuit is also based on an pro view, which decides that the essence of the operation, the consumer interface, and the consumer aspect code of every of the two applications are similar to completely similar and that “there is no likelihood of obtaining this amount of similarity, if the new app was made from scratch… there is no question that this is a hurried copy/paste of the primary software program task.” As if this isn’t plenty of, the pro, Dude Ronen, promises that in factors where the two applications existing slight variations in software program, this is an exertion to “camouflage,” the duplication endeavours, through the addition of the Lusha branding inside the opening/closing of the application, has no rational justification.

The lawsuit, as said, indicates that the venture funds fund found out that it experienced been a victim of fraud only many thanks to posts in “Globes”, which showcased Lusha and interviewed its CEO Assaf Eisenstein, in December 2021. The plaintiffs observed an report in “Globes” entitled, “We been given several e-mails from money, and we stated no thanks: the startup that isn’t going to want investors.” The plaintiffs have been amazed to learn that the report involves an job interview with Assaf Eisenstein, who clarifies his doctrine with regard to relationships between business owners and buyers. He is offered in the write-up as the man or woman heading Lusha, and as ‘someone who had managed with no exterior funding right until six months earlier.’

No remark has nonetheless been acquired from Lusha.

Printed by Globes, Israel small business information – en.globes.co.il – on Could 8, 2022.

© Copyright of Globes Publisher Itonut (1983) Ltd., 2022.